/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15995642

>>15081941
>didn’t read the question

>>14777729
Dude, it's not that hard. Feel the differential equations instead of conceptualizing them!

I want to make a fantasy weapon called an Ion Grenade, but I don't know if that would work.
It's basically a flash grenade but magic, and I don't know if having a whole lot of 'clustered' pos/neg Ions would really do anything because I know literally nothing about Ions beyond Destroy All Humans having an Ion Detonator that launched a plasma Ion Bomb that disintegrated shit in its explosion radius, and the Low Orbit Ion Cannon that still gets used in raids to fire ebin lazors for DDoSing people.
How do Ion theoretically make flash gooder? It's easy to stretch and bullshit things a little as this is fantasy, I just need some groundwork.

>>11600090
>So, just like, you know, the Euler identity?
>Except that for it we don't need vectors.
>You don't have to explain the i.
>Way easier and elementary, since no vectors are necessary. >Only rotations.
You know you're retarded, right?
If you believe it's way more elementary, PROVE IT. NO ONE HAS BEEN ABLE TO PROVIDE A FULL PROOF using Euler's identity. I'm 100% certain by now that this is because they don't know themselves how to prove it. If you have a full proof using Euler's identity in terms that a (theoretical) fifth grader or a person who's just started learning trig can understand, present it!
NO ONE HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO IT
Why do you keep mentioning the proof if you can't write it out in full!? Maybe if you actually write it out you'll realize it's a complete autistic clusterfuck of a proof that no fifth grader will ever be capable of fully understanding or have the attention span to read through.

>>11584960
It sure is. And psychedelics are at the forefront of consciousness and neurology research. Denying psychedelics as useful research tools is like denying biochemistry altogether.

>be autist
>le 4chans
>epic haxxors
>LOL

>>11564436

>>11010129

>>10921492
Okay, I fold.
Good night, friend.

>>10383110
>be OP
>be a cocksucking mega faggot
>Loser pleb, he thinks he's hot shit but he's slightly above average in terms of grades compared to the rest of the class but fails at being a likable person
>Thinks he's intelligent but autistic as hell and has the mentally mature as a fucking toddler
>Apply to medical school
>Gets rejected the fact that he's unlikable socially inept cock goblin
>biomedical engineer applies to medical school
>Gets accepted because he's a normal well rounded individual

>>10306168
Fuck off autist

>>9701914
Not even. The construction of English is a formally ambiguous grammar at best (which is to say it’s not part of a family of regular or even context-free grammars). While English is what academic papers are written in, the foundations of math are pretty deeply rooted in first order logic (or lambda calculus if you want to describe process or computation)

How can you talk about probability without talking about support sets? How can you talk about number theory if you don’t have any notion of induction on infinite sets, much less a notion of cardinality to talk about what sets the study number theory apart than just differential and integral calculus? While not every mathematician is a logician, it’s foolish to say logic hasn’t left an indelible mark on the way mathematics is developed. Just because you may like another field of mathematics, this notion of “purely mathematical” is sort of ironically fucked; mathematics has always either taken tools from logic or developed its own tools to further its study, so there’s this sense that mathematics refers more to the study of structures and calculi using any useful tool rather than asking “well is this tool mathemagical??” (Though the study of the tools and why they should work in the first place is valuable)

>>9507722
>>9507721

>open paper
>indian co-author
>close paper
>mfw