[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.6382778 [View]
File: 571 KB, 1600x1131, 0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6382778

>>6382767

Geez, idk OTHER FORMS OF DEATH maybe...

And no your still wrong see >>6382582

Oh and nice strawman

>> No.6241435 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 571 KB, 1600x1131, 1387667931016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6241435

Emotions can be formalized into language, thus a solution is an emotion that stays problem free after formalized. Intuition is a naturaly useful emotion. Memory is a replay of inputs and goal is a constant thought. Start from this.

>> No.6124107 [View]
File: 571 KB, 1600x1131, logical fallacies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6124107

/sci/, I've been reading up about argumentative logic, and it's still kinda hazy to me.

What's the difference between a red herring and a straw man argument?

How on earth can I tell when a fallacy fallacy is being committed, because it seems like by pointing out any fallacy (including this one), then I am just committing a fallacy fallacy.

Is the case where someone just refuses to believe any of your premises, a form of "moving the goalposts"?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]