/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16066355
blow me.

>>15493570
you know what else you wrote in your post? where you quoted the authors of the paper?
>"The above overview of model predictions (i.e., produced by GCM scenario simulations) and projections (i.e., resulting from the synthesis of GCM output with observations of sea ice)
so here you are, claiming it's not a model. meanwhile you also posted that the authors stated it's a model. either you're a liar, or an idiot. i honestly don't care which. the point is that your argument is self-defeating.

also i'm not the same anon you were originally arguing with. i just saw you saying something indefensibly stupid.

international flights, gas guzzling cars, heavy meat diet

seethe and cope, eurocucks. reduce your emissions all you want. i'll contribute enough for all of us, and then some.

seethe and cope, alarmists. reduce your emissions, i don't care. i emit enough for all of us. :-)