/sci/ - Science & Math

[math]/\mathfrak{mg}/[/math]

Platonic universe edition
Talk maths, formerly >>16187402

The solar system looks like THAT?

>>7090746
oh, is there a geometric, or deduced logical proof of that?

I mean, can you 'see' this object like you could see a four square or an eight cube?

Is there a limit to what you can and can't graph?

I'd like to get into math fields that exploit graphs more than any other thing, what should I be focusing on, and what should I avoid?

>>7060491
fuck off.
>>7060463
OP, I've gone down this path only little ways so far, and it is astounding what you learn when you apply yourself.

what you really learn is how idiotic people are, they inundate the language of mathematics without even the slightest intuition as to how to creatively deduce anything true from it, aside from whatever another mathematician has conceived already.

the sort of arrogant stagnation of our education system the world over has to deal with these imbeciles, but you don't have to. Remember this formula

geometer + artist + mathematician + logician + philosopher + inventor = plato
mathematician = neuman
neuman = 1/6th plato
everybody here isn't a tenth as smart as neuman
neuman wasn't a tenth as smart as plato or Archimedes, yet their work is what lead to anything perceptive we deduce in math modernly.


in other words, everybody here is a complete fucking toolbag including myself, and I'm fine with that. I think admitting stupidity is the first step to learning fuck all.

The current model of dimensions above 4 is wrong.