/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7251452

>>6510862
thanks for contributing. nifty little graph.

>>4944144

2

2/4 organic chemistry

flood detected

4/16

>>3086301
Organic*

4/32

>>2183138


>If this is true, then why is there such a controversy over the NASA press conference concerning extremophiles in arsenic?

>politics

>So, how can you explain away the open peer review process?

>I really don't give a shit about some institutional process that originates in simple power relations and is nothing more than a product ideology. Do be a bit more abstract here.

This isn't a place for abstract thoughts, this is a place for rational thought and debate.

This has nothing to do with politics. If someone started passing out 'medicine' to sick very children, then another person found out that this medicine was just a placebo and then pointed them out on being wrong, would you consider this a move on politics?

By this reasoning, shouldn't your own arguments and views now be nothing more then politics? Your trying to prove a point, so obviously from your perspective you don't care about the facts at hand, but rather more concerned with the entities involved and not details.

If you look at a scientific controversy and all you can take away from it is 'politics', then you are the reason why western society is failing at the moment. You have no care or concern for the reality of the situation and only care on nonsensical bullshit that will no one will ever benefit from.

Pic related, because OP only thinks its for politics and control through his narrowly tweaked blinders

Organic Chem 1 part 2 of 4

Organic Chemistry, 2/4

>>1653392
Don't some /ck/ info's, i'll dump what i have of /sci/
Putting on my trip to help distinguish whats what

2

Organic Chemistry (1)
2/4

2/4