/sci/ - Science & Math

We had a discussion a few days ago. I claimed that the classical model for the Bell theorem was being misrepresented. I proved that, and some anon were kind enough to direct me to a less ridiculous treatment of the classical case. The problem is that the treatment provide in the link below , although less ridiculous, is still not correct. I took the time to draw up a solution for Bells experiment for classical physics. It matches experiment results. It violates Bells inequality, since it's semi classical yet identical to the quantum result.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301010418300648?via%3Dihub#s0030

>>11689440
You know what, I'll do the spoon feeding, since you've refused to actually look at the angles and do the calculation that I've repeatedly asked.
Fig. 3 of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.04.001
Here's the actual classical EM prediction, which performs strictly worse than best possible local hidden variables models.