/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11350028
I wonder what micoorganism on me think when i have sex. Hope they are cheering me on

Abortion is murder, but it is the only case where murder should be legal.
Prove me wrong.
Protip: You can't.

>>10647344

Why are so many on this board obsessed with IQ? Do they not realise that it's a flawed system of measuring intelligence? Do they not realise that intelligence is more complicated than noticing patterns? Are they just insecure brainlets? Please /sci/, end this faggotry.

Is semen mixed together from seminal fluid and sperm during ejaculation? Or is sperm and semen mixed earlier, stored, and then ejaculated later? If so, where is it stored? I’d appreciate if someone explained the process clearly from beginning to end, since the places I’ve looked seem to have conflicting messages.

Anyone done this?

>>10031864
Based big brain anon.

>>9887442
>In the second picture she has a more feminine and submissive posture.
Maybe, but I believe that the aesthetics are massively different mainly because the first picture displays a girl with little to no detectable "defects" (i.e. posture is good, body shape is good, makeup is good, facial features are smooth) while the second one has a more "human" feeling to it (looks "bad" but you can imagine yourself interacting with her) in contrast with the first one which feels more like watching decoration (looks good but it's just not how a human looks in a casual moment)
I can imagine a girl making that face or having that "bad" posture when fucking, the first picture looks way too forced to even imagine yourself pounding her.
TL;DR I believe that the second picture subconsciously reminds me more of how girls look like when having sex and the first one just looks like a common, boring picture for a collection of generic instagram photos.

Hey /sci/
Just wanted to know when you first got seduced by the beauty of the sciences and the symphony of math

>>9720982
Jokes on you buddy, I only watch JAPANESE cartoons for children and Rick and Morty ™

And just for the record, I am waaaaaay smarter than your dumb ass.

>>9659789
>So, when are we actually going to start addressing what they found in this study
>This has tremendous implications.

Not really. Basically, the brain continues to function temporarily after we assume its "death" as confirmed in other studies by electroencephalography surges post cardiac arrest. Consciousness is a limited part of brain function as evident by subconscious processing which does not require our input e.g. activation of the sympathetic nervous system. As a result, it should be no amazing feat that the brain can sometimes recall to us the events surrounding a lack of consciousness as doing so would provide the individual with potentially valuable information to avoid similar events in the future thereby increasing its survival.

>>9577827
My brain.