/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9295608
>(recall sections 8.7.1, 2.3.3, and 5.4.3)

>>9158335
(ie spreading the idea that borders are bad)
this is a blatantly wrong statement and a ridiculous interpretation of the intentionality and the effect of the 'liberal' media advocating for the STATE allowing immigration. It all has to do with the ideological protection of neoliberal trade policies like NA"FT"A. lets take NA**A as an example, the mass immigration of Mexican peasantry following market liberalization in mexico and the resulting disintegration of its established socio-ecological systems is a consequence. The media has a vested interest in allowing the business class to have access to cheap immigrant labor. The state neoliberal policy and therefor borders and is implicit in cheap immigrant labor and the corporate hegemony to exist. If there are no borders to cross there is no way to establish economic domination of the population immigrating. The media NEVER pushes ideology advocating for the absence of borders. It pushes an ideaology that protects the unrestrained flow of capital across borders into the hands of economic power(transnational corporations) enough of me talking about. Have a video of an expert and anarchist(who is basically blacklisted from appearing on the mainstream media) discussing this, that i highly recommend you watch https://youtu.be/zbBgSZv5z9c
>Antifa, BLM, etc gets basically zero flak for what they do?
>organizing and subsequently getting beaten, arrested and pushed into violent situations by police repression
>zero flak
wew lad

>>9081123
>Ah yes, "emergent properties". Another word for magic.

>>9064873
go ahead and name one
>thinking levels exist
you mean scale of analysis, brainlet