/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11308411

>>11168791

>>9758069
>a 100 dollar sale wont simply replace the loss the store took.
...of course.

>That's why it takes much more than 100 in sales to make it back.
Naturally.

>That's money the store doesn't get in profit,
No, it's money the store doesn't get in GROSS.
Wait... even that's not right.
She doesn't reduce the store's gross at all.
The store's gross either remains the same, or goes up by $70, depending on how you interpret the question.

But your interpretation should be predicated on the context of the question, and it should be clear that since you're solving a puzzle instead of doing accounting for an actual store, the answer is $100.

>>9758069
>a 100 dollar sale wont simply replace the loss the store took.
...of course.

>That's why it takes much more than 100 in sales to make it back.
Naturally.

>That's money the store doesn't get in profit,
No, it's money the store doesn't get in GROSS.
Wait... even that's not right.
She doesn't reduce the store's gross at all.
The store's gross either remains the same, or goes up by $70, depending on how you interpret the question.

But your interpretation should be predicated on the context of the question, and it should be clear that since your solving a puzzle instead of doing accounting for an actual store, the answer is $100.

>>9758069
>a 100 dollar sale wont simply replace the loss the store took.
...of course.

>That's why it takes much more than 100 in sales to make it back.
Naturally.

>That's money the store doesn't get in profit,
No, it's money the store doesn't get in GROSS.
Wait... even that's not right.
She doesn't reduce the store's gross at all.
The store's gross either remains the same, or goes up by $70, depending on how you interpret the question.

But your interpretation should be predicated on the context of the question, and it should be clear that since your solving a puzzle instead of doing accounting for an actual store, the answer is $100.