/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12631422
There are varying degrees of differences between studies. Sampling, calculations, population - everything differs. The same can be said about the study types: descriptive, correlational, experimental, etc. If you look at a single study and come to a conclusion, at least make it a meta-analysis.
I'm also Catholic, but work in STEM. Clearly, you don't work in STEM otherwise you'd have a better grasp of the scientific model we use for research. You should consider taking a course about reading and writing research so you know what everything really means, and learn how to treat research. Also, if you only read the abstract and conclusions you're a fag.

>>12460730
Imagine NOT having a hidden underground laboratory where you conduct experiments for the greater good. There's no ethics rules while underground, those rules are only for surface dwellers. Also based because you can fund private research with under-the-table type payment.
Right now I have a participant coming to my lair to help me with some research. All I do is force them into a room with no lights on and they have to continue screaming until the lights come on. I leave them alone in the dark for an hour, then I flicker the lights on/off once per second and then I throw fireworks outside the door and get my dog to bark at them. After all of this happens I record perirectal galvanic skin responses with combined introduction of vicious whipping. So far I've found psychological stress has no effect on pucker factor, even when paired with the whipping control. Also, I've went ahead and have been sampling urine for a manipulation control - there is elevated sugar in the piss which indicated adrenocortico hormone release. I'm stumped, anyone have suggestions?