3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
Why are ad hominems considered a fallacy and a no-go in scientific debate? The greatest thinkers of history basically all agree that actions are virtuous, not words. So if a fat medical scientist tries to tell me something, the counterargument "ok but you're fat" is not a fallacy or an insult. It is a logically and philosophically triumphant rebuttal.