/sci/ - Science & Math

You are a machine. A barely complicated bio machine. Everything that ails you is repairable through engineering. Everything. All the solutions have already been invented, prototyped, patented. So, then, why does your "civilization" fail to repair your diseased soul encapsulating machines? To keep every flesh shell in a perpetual state of health?

Primarily 1.): Extremely difficult economic factors, to industrialize and scale solutions from conceptualization to market(we cannot even feed every person; developing personalized gene therapy for each individual is impossible until quantum computers become common place(10-20+ years, so eventually but will happen way faster with actual world wide support, instead of the many parasitic industries syphoning away funding)).

Less so 2.): Persistent cult like dogmas that infect most proto religions and ideologies, insisting death is inevitable, should not be fought against, god would punish you for extending life without its permission, etc(this was mostly being defeated by feats such as landing on the moon, pushing mankind from childhood into an adolescence where it would be responsible for its own advancement via science, instead of relying upon the good will of god, but now we have retards that think the earth is flat).

Much less so 3.): Rich "people". The ones that behind closed doors see you all to be of no use more than minimum wage flesh automatons. The ones that see you as temporary and consumable objects, barely sentient beings that can be of further use, at end of life, recycled into fertilizer; cheaper versions of roboticized labor, without all the immense danger of A.I. rebellion. Too blind, or too afraid, to see the potential in you all becoming benevolent, immortal juggernauts in the coming space civilization, they interfere with the creation of utopia as suicidal children, but are only temporarily misguided and may be converted to good.

It is an honor to be of the last generations that will experience death.

>>10577997
>free energy devices
This triggers my autism like no other because it takes a middle-school student's level of knowledge to debunk it.
"Free energy" Implies that you are creating energy outta basically nothing, or that you're getting more energy out of something than you're putting in, which is retarded because lol thermodynamics (If I recall correctly)
If we hold E=mc^2 to be true (matter & energy are the same physical entity and can change into one another in tard terms), then the law of conservation of mass ("matter cannot be created or destroyed, only change forms") is also applicable to energy. Which means, that you cannot create or destroy energy, but only change forms. The fact that you cannot create either mass or energy means that there will never be a true "free" energy device, unless you break physics and start using cheat-codes.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong or outdated.