/sci/ - Science & Math

today's science:

> humans have no subspecies
> humans have no race
> humans have no varieties

also science:

> human is animal

So why the hell do these taxonomic classifications not apply to us like animals? There are animals without a subspecies like the hyacinth macaw, but this one, unlike us, does not have a genetic or morphological variety, this is not our case, nor does the term breed used in domestic animals belonging to the same subspecies apply to us.

So if we have no variety, no race, no subspecies, how does science explain our genetic and morphological differences?

>>10692211
>she
no need to explain any further anon, we all already understand.

>>10692239
it is simply made for white girls to post on their internet and then vomit out later.

>>10679674
Have you ever heard the phrase "not to scale"?

>>9569442
They are, just not dumb ones like this. We're not here to help you with your homework, go to /sqt/ for that. This is mainly for discussions and advice and so on... /sqt/ was iiterally made for dumbass questions like yours so take advantage of that and don't flood us with this garbage

>>9425306
It hasn't happened, just opinions so far and rants about the readability of the papers. No one has actually disproved IUT and found flaws yet so >>9426013 is lying, that is just a article and thread of opinions on why his papers suck and not that IUT is inconsistent.

>>9424520
You're gonna need a bigger bait

>>9399787
>>9399837
>>9399868
>>9399884
>>9399899

genetic issues with artificial wombs - yeah the sperm is authentic but what genetic code does the egg have? It cant all come from the guy because the sperm only has half of it.
> so pretty much you're looking at having women as egg donors and you're technically having a child with That Woman its just being carried via an artificial surrogate
Lack of authentic breastmilk is also going to impact the child's health.

Also about the women - more than likely women will roll up their sleeves and become more confident and aggressive about sexuality. For once we'll see women treating sex and intimacy like they were men, they wont be dismissive, coy, play hard to get or lead men into the pursuit game - they'll pursue men and be a purring pussy for the man who accepts her.
> because she knows thats what he's honestly after and if she provides in spades then he'll be whipped and the rest of the benefits of a relationship will come out of that.
> she'll put out even more aggressively if she feels like he's slipping away from her, even if she isnt a nympho she'll become like that out of desperation.
> itll give women more strength to tough things out too, because then having a Traditional Relationship will become an achievement

>>8904535
>There is no biological basis for race

>>7915406
>That guy in class who takes notes in LaTeX