/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9784243
Oh hey it’s you again.
Neat concept guy here

It is already firmly established that light does indeed move at a constant speed regardless of reference frame. And so oncemore, to make such a huge claim you’ll need lots of evidence.

You kind of remind me of a younger me. I would dabble and come up with math problems and then extrapolate nonsensical answers and try to use them as proof. And time and time again I was often wrong or half wrong. I never stopped to rigorously extrapolate the consequences of my “proof” nor did I seek out evidence to support my claims. I just fixated on my derivation. I’ve now come to see that a while versed mathematician should first play and compare the conclusions of their theories to ensure their validity. And you should do the same too

That being said it’s great that you’re thinking and attempting new things. And if you keep at it I’m sure you’ll discover something first, before others. And if not you’ll at least be great at your craft

Just work on making your arguments more concrete