/sci/ - Science & Math

pls

>>12574859
According to sources the last guy seem to be working on sn9 is named Jeffry Bezzoso.

A new guy. Maybe he’s got something to do with this abort?

Why is biology assumed to be easier than physics?

>>12139715
Basically sequences of images, that's usually how i think most of the time.
When you think "oh shit i'm feeling kinda hungry right now, i'd like to eat some pasta with sauce"
in my mind i just view and image of past with sauce and or me eating it in a fraction of a second.

>>12076980
>it's hotter outside by one degree and the sea level increased by one cm lets start a war with our neighbours

why is water wet

I mean, my country provides a lot of sea transportation for goods that America uses and such. And we're in NATO. Do I count as American for today?

how do I know if a thought is my own genuine opinion? or if it's just cope?

Okay I need some /sci/ logicians / chemists to tell me if I'm retarded or not.
On my orgo final we had a question where we had to explain why statements are wrong. The statement in the question is: "Amines have pyramidal structure because they are sp3 hybridized"
In response, I said that this is incorrect reasoning because there are molecules such as methane where the carbon is sp3 hybridized yet it exhibits tetrahedral geometry. I also said that the initial statement implied that all sp3 hybridized structures are pyramidal, and thus methane contradicts this.
In response, the professor said that the statement does not imply that and that there could be added "methane has a tetrahedral geometry because of the sp3 hybridized orbitals" and it wouldn't contradict the previous statement.
Is this true?
Logically speaking, can a single factor A (in this case sp3 hybridization) give rise to two outcomes B and C if they cannot coexist (in this case pyramidal and tetrahedral geometry)? I've never taken a logic course in my life but I believe that's what this boils down to.