/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15791245
>something about empty statements because ze was offended by calling zirs practice nu-sci
use your grey matter
you might be able to infer the arguments and reasons residing in those statements.

picrel is (you)

>never was intended to be a model therefore it can't be a theory
stop tickling me please this is just too funny
>Without mathematics there no way to objectively test things.
please stop tickling me

>You observe zero unicorns. Is that consistent with your model?
Yes.

>All theories in physics are models.
Here we go again, this is just like the stupid alphabet agenda with the stupid shit like "acktually there is no such thing as a man or a woman, it's all part of a spectrum",
appropriate, claim, and rewrite it to suit your stupid methods and stupid agenda which is just mental masturbation.
"oh wow look i made this MODEL of a galaxy in a computer, this must be what it really looks like!!!! epic!"
"oh wow the higgs boson is confirmed because of a statistically significant peak in a distribution curve from thousands of experiments!!! who would have thought!??"

fucking stupid as fuck...
those people are mentally on the same level as you, you do realize that right?

and here we go again,
more alphabet agenda style appropriating and rewriting of history and science such as:
>"Theory" isn't actually formally defined in science
>sometimes people use theory to mean well tested and physically meaningful models
>"Theory" is literally just a label
>There is no objective definition of "Theory"

>>15754674
>That's like saying it's impossible to test for the feeling that any drug induces on a person.
Wrong, it's not the same thing, and it is impossible to test for the feeling.
Ever wonder why writers like Hunter Thompson and Aldous Huxley are considered by some as "classics"?
It's because the experiences are difficult to properly and accurately describe.
not to mention psychedelics are barely even consumed or react in the body, the highest amount which has been reported to have been converted to another form was with the least efficient compound mescaline at 30-percent conversion, and yet the effects are so strong and profound.
LSd has been reported as reacted at most 10-percent, often less.
drugs which are much weaker in action have much stronger conversion rates, which indicates that the pharmacological effects of ANY bioactive substance is generally inverse to the effect on the "feelings" or "experience" or state of mind of the subject.

>so called "subjective experiences" of being drunk
pic related is (you)

>>15641370
>How is this cryptic
>more spatially aware of electrodes in relation to each other
>as much contact as possible with the 'same'
>as many 1d conductor channel overlaps as possible
I'm onto you clown