/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11077185
>50 years ago no one imagined humans would leave a footprint on the moon
this is the sort of knowledge level I now expect from people working with NASA in 2019

>>10928049
I don't like them either, but that's a yikes from me

>>9542268
>And before retards start coming in to debate this, please tell me how to get this this mythical realm of yours where one can possess 7 + 9i apples.
Please tell me how one can possess -7 apples. Please tell me how one can possess 2.15 apples. Please tell me how one can possess [math]\sqrt{2}[/math] apples. Please tell me how one can possess 10^100 apples. Please tell me how one can possess x apples where [math]x^2+1=0[/math].

>>9532468
>>9532476
>>9532490

bamp

>>8247163
Great, more resources for third worlds to squander, endless dog days, and no more snow. Sounds like paradise.

>>7718064
>power a town of 1000 for around 10 minutes
and that number alone doesn't tip you off as to why noone does this

seek help, you're mentally completely retarded

>>7711594

>>7642012
>The main barrier that I am imagining is, will the insulin be absorbed quickly enough to respond to blood sugar spikes
>absorption
>main barrier
>not the fact that an uncontrollable production of insulin will kill you dead

>>7592228
>Honestly its hard for me to imagine that just letting irregular tissue go away on its own is somehow a worse idea than bombarding the body whit radiation and toxins.
it's hard for me to imagine being this dense, but here you are anyway
the very definition of cancer is that "letting irregular tissue go away" DOES NOT WORK ANYMORE
there is no suicide command left to be executed in an actively spreading tumor

what drives cancer patients to chemo/radiation is a dirt simple calculation

option A)
>do nothing
the cancer keeps spreading and mutating until it has damaged enough vital organs to kill you dead

option B)
>get yourself a nice cup of chemo
the chemo starts poisoning your body, with the hope that the cancer dies before you do

option A gives you a 100% chance of death, assuming that the cancer is of the kind that actually requires treatment in the first place
option B gives you a chance of death lower than 100%, because you introduce the possibility of your whole body surviving the treatment longer than the small subcomplex of cancer cells that it houses

>>7574997
>>7575036
>let's put moss on streets to improve traction!
>moss would actually reduce traction
>well...uhm...then we should make it so that moss improves traction!!
what the fuck is wrong with you
are you clinically retarded?