/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9425510
"Intersex" individuals, previously known as hermaphrodites, were born with one fully functioning set of reproductive organs, and a half developed set of non-functioning organs of the other biological sex.

This happens because of a mutation during conception, and the individual is only capable of performing the role of one biological sex in the role of reproduction, not both - making them by allow accounts, either MALE or FEMALE, not a unicorn.

I am sick of liberal retards purposely using ambiguous terminology to obfuscate the truth of the matter. If they were truly "intersex", they would be able to provide both semen and eggs in the reproductive act, and would therefore be able to inseminate themselves, making them literally an asexually reproducing organism.

Because the way human hormones work, it is physically impossible for one human to become pregnant and produce semen - so no, there is no such thing as "intersex" people, their own innate human biology forces their fucked up genes to conform to one biological sex, and that's that.

>>8833455
Very real.

>>6557516
People have flawed ideas of how evolution works too, there needs to be significant "selection pressure" or change doesn't happen. A lot of the details of how our bodies work are kludges that aren't the optimal way of solving a problem but are good enough that they've stayed around.

The classic example is the eye of humans and most other animals:
>Retarded design whereby there are no photoreceptors where the optic nerve enters
>This means you have a "blind spot" in your vision
>But you don't normally notice it because your brain interpolates and MAKES SHIT UP to fill in the hole

Cell transport proteins are another good one, some move around when they need to, which is like if you needed a new door upstairs in your house but rather than building one instead built a mechanism to transport one from downstairs as needed.