/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3799460

>I would imagine food would be too complex for a molecular assembler.

Of course. But I was thinking: That which cannot be synthesized by a molecular assembler or by other mechanical means can be synthesized by a nanoscale, highly efficient chemical synthesis plant created by a molecular assembler.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lab-on-a-chip
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microfluidics

Trippin' balls.

>>3640018
>>3640018
>>3640018

whoa brah, I said nothing about being forced. to elaborate, i mean giving back on your own terms, like writing a book with ideas you want to share, or finding out some specific greenhouse design is more efficient than the conventional model, allowing more people to live in abundance. actually to be quite specific, what i mean is sharing self-empowering knowledge that you have acquired, so that others may be self-empowered. I should also state that a race of creatures is far more likely to survive than a single specimen, and that DNA itself is far more likely to achieve immortality than a single species, or a single specimen.

empowering self<empowering species<empowering all life.

i should also state that the individual is an illusion, the ego keeps us safe, keeps us apart. etc.

you should now better be able to understand what i mean. but definitely not completely. words are inefficient.