/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5511301

Depends. Wet nanotech (DNA origami, polymers, self-assembly, basically ordinary chemistry we've been doing for thousands of years) is the one that's most popular because most of the problems have been worked out. Dry nanotech (I'm assuming you mean this by posting that picture) is more resource-constrained and most of the research has been within the environment of forgiving computer simulations. Though if you can contribute it will be most appreciated. Some info:

http://www.molecularassembler.com/Nanofactory/
http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/mbb/mbb.html
http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/nanotech/
http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/nanotech/freitas_process/notes.txt
http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/2007/04/
rob-freitas-interview/http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/09/eric-drexler-ralph-merkle-or-robert.html
http://nanoengineer-1.net/mediawiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
http://www.iase.cc/
http://www.somewhereville.com/
http://www.molecularassembler.com/Nanofactory/Challenges.htm
http://www.molecularassembler.com/Nanofactory/AnnBibDMS.htm
http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/nanotechAndMedicine.html

I've been making some nanotechnology infographics to explain this, since it's faster than linking people to all this.