/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7601655
> 1 paper counts as 1783 papers
lol. for starters these aren't all peer reviewed research papers; it says on the abstract that they are reviews, relevant opinions and reports. You have not cited anything that even mentions the safety of GMOs, and you don't even know if the individual papers have showed any negative effects.
You might have linked to wikipedia since it's full citations too.

If that count then here : This is an article that is composed of the studies and reports of European scientists.
http://www.enveurope.com/content/26/1/13

before you cry about Seralini, it's only one of them, and here it says they retracted and then republished the paper :
> We also show that the decision to retract cannot be rationalized on any discernible scientific or ethical grounds. Censorship of research into health risks undermines the value and the credibility of science; thus, we republish our paper. Even your own abstract says that the health hazards of GMO is still a highly intense debate.