/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12716626
>cherrypicking
How?

>adjusted to show acceleration
False. Pic related.

>projection has much higher rate than temperature record
Doesn't match the graph I posted.

You're pathetic.

Daily reminder deniercucks don't want you to see this image

>>11093663
>Can you provide the source to your graph?
The source is in the image.

>The graph in my source comes from the actual satellite website.
It doesn't. RSS would not cherrypick its own data and put a fake trendline on it. The graph is from Christopher Monckton, another loon.

>Well he must be doing something right considering businesses are willing to pay him for his predictions.
So fortune tellers, astrologers, and tarot card readers must be doing something right too, since they get paid. Also, his business went public and tanked, he had to take it off the exchange.

>Is temperature data fiddled in any way to create warmer temperatures than were actually observed?
It's actually the opposite, pic related. Plus you already claimed satellite data shows cooling, now you'll immediately abandon it when it doesn't give the result you like? The only one fiddling with data is you.

This kills the tinfoil hat denier

>>10602058
>Tony Heller was raised in Los Alamos and has degrees in geology and EE. He does exactly what you mentioned. He even goes back years to get the old data to show past data is being manipulated.
He doesn't spend a single sentence analyzing why these adjustments are made. He simply assumes they are fraudulent because they exist. But that's not all, he cherrypicks the data to reach the conclusions he wants. Why is he only talking about US temperatures when the claim is about global warming? Because he knows that if he showed the global raw data vs. adjusted data it would show the exact opposite of what he needs for his conspiracy theory. Pic related. Why are climate scientists cooling the global trend if these adjustments are fraudulent? By Tony's "logic" this must mean that climatologists are trying to make global warming look less worse than it actually is. One can only conclude that Tony is either an utterly incompetent excuse for a "geologist" or a manipulative fraudster.