/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8997069
>Also, what exactly is up with that whackadoodle picture?
Homo erectus moved out at an earlier time (Babel), while the Neanderthals are most likely the result of deformities (acromegaly, arthritis, etc) due to malnourishment in a post-flood world. "Modern" man is merely the result of better nutrition/genetic variability.

>no shit, Sherlock
While the muscles and other such things are material, the skin and eyes (most "emotional" points of the body) are surprisinglily human-like for a creature closer to an ape. Make the same "reconstructions" with the skin and eyes of a chimp, and no-one would think these things were related to us.

>aaand now you're quoting G.K. Chesterton, a POET with no background in (paleo)anthropology.
His argument still stands, you can't make hasty conclusions and expect people to take you seriously.

Are evolution and atheism inseparable, or can one exist without the other?