/sci/ - Science & Math

What STEM field has the highest % of females?

>>11088686
my FUCKING DICK

>>9639695
going into grad school in the fall for EE, focus in optics and communications with a little bit of microelectronics, starting with a MSEE then going to a PhD

>Am I burned out yet?

I guess I'll have to see what the future holds.

>>9572761
>A reader has pointed out to me that the dimensions appear to be off in that final equation. What causes it is that I am multiplying a distance by a distance, which appears to give us a distance squared. Go back two steps and you will see what I mean. But a distance times a distance is not a distance squared, if they are in line. A distance times a distance is a distance squared only in the case that the two distances are orthogonal, so that we have a square or something. A distance times a distance in line cannot be a distance squared anymore than a distance plus a distance can be a distance squared. This is another mainstream misunderstanding.

>I have used algebra here to solve, but notice that if we use integration, we get the same problem: ∫(2x + y)dx = x(x + y). We integrate a sum but get meters squared.

>This problem ties into the historical problem of velocity squared versus acceleration. Physics has never been clear about the mechanical difference. One has meters squared in the numerator and one does not, but are they really different? No. A square velocity IS an acceleration, by definition, so if we are getting different dimensions it is by ignoring some mechanics. We see that in this problem very clearly: if we multiply a velocity times a velocity in a field, we should get an acceleration. Therefore the extra length in the numerator is just that: extra. [You can now read more about this in a separate paper.]
This is the best thing I've ever read

>>9103306
That seriously answered nothing. Does he anywhere in his speech say that he believes he can literally telepathicly talk to a creator, or that its a metaphor for psychology and not literally a physical entity?

It can't be that hard ot answer that if he actually adresses it. How can this not be known information if he's that famous and talks that much about it..

If he doesn't, why would I possibly listen to hours of unrelated talks?

>>9014419
>"I almost said 'on your watch' LOL"
>LOL

>>8645465
Yes, because of cellular bactalchydral that is likely to make up the formation of any intestinal processes in a sentient extraterrestrial.

You're welcome.

my girlfriend, who is studying physics (3rd year now) is about to take personal lessons from her professor to ''improve her grades''.

he's young, good looking, ripped as fuck, owns a car and lives by himself in his bachelor pad.

she's about to see him twice a week, once in his cabinet and once in his apartment.

should i be worried? are professors of physics something to be afraid of? i won't end up cucked, r-right?