[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.10607278 [View]
File: 73 KB, 521x400, IMG_20190501_170416.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10607278

>>10607242
They have data dating far back as 1750 in archives. But since is not as accurate as it is today they have to have wide uncertainty ranges. You brainlet

>> No.10440876 [View]
File: 73 KB, 521x400, DHXLQqCVoAAYIhq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10440876

>>10439123
By sampling enough points you reduce the error to a negligible amount. What is the issue?

>> No.10390759 [View]
File: 73 KB, 521x400, DHXLQqCVoAAYIhq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10390759

>>10390421
Did you try looking for the answer? Because I found it in a few seconds of googling.

>> No.10365515 [View]
File: 73 KB, 521x400, DHXLQqCVoAAYIhq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10365515

>>10365399
>Agw is supported by observations that average global temp has increased by 1 degree Celsius since 1860.
It's more like 1.5 degrees but OK.

>Now imagine this, we have to extrapolate temps to areas we don't directly measure and justify the accuracy of the measurements are within 1 degree.
Already been done, pic related. Why do you think that time period was chosen as the beginning of the record? Also, proxy climate data supports the thermometer record.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]