/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11440388
>Then your question makes no sense,
Why? Pretty simple really.You stating gravity is a force also doesn't make sense. Lets sit here and just talk of no use then I guess.

>Yes.
No. Otherwise describing a painting would explain how and why it was created. You can't just sit and point at something expecting it to explain itself.

>Then how are measurements done? You're retarded.
The "standard of measure" is completely arbitrary you fucking idiot. If you were and actual scientist you would understand that the subdivisions OF SOMETHING ELSE THAT EXISTS is not "something it and of itself". It's like saying "an inch exists". An inch of what? What the fuck are you speaking about?

>Where did I say anything about measurement?
>No, it's a property of matter that you can measure. You are confusing measurement with what's being measured.

"Mass" is not a thing in and of itself, which you seem to be confusing it as. It's a measure of "matter"; the "thing " that can be shown to exist. Unless of course you would actually like to explain to me what mass is, something you STILL have not done.

>Explain what "hot" and "cold" are without description or relation.
An explanation can use several descriptions, what is it that you're trying to prove exactly? What if I cannot explain one without the other?

>No I didn't, illiterate retard.
You literally did, sorry I'm losing you.

>Yes, how do you measure what doesn't exist?
You can measure whatever the fuck you want, however you want. It's arbitrary, that's what "arbitrary" implies.
>Explain how your dick can be a real thing that exists.
I can test it in a scientific experiment

>Keep crying about shit that's empirically verifiable.
So test "mass" and "gravity" in a scientific experiment. You can try "space" too if you want.

>>11268299
>Completely ignoring the point
How? I am asking for the evidence you fucking retard. I never said the evidence was absent. Learn to read, especially the more-than-a-dozen posts I have made asking "Where is the empirical evidence of space"?

SHOW IT TO ME. I AM NOT AFFIRMING IT OR DENYING IT.

Because
I
Literally
Have
No
Fucking
Evidence

Do you get it yet?

>>11166369
>>11166376
>>11166356
>>11167168
>>11167957
>>11167968
>>11168834
what is this thing you refer to as "space" that allows it to have properties to begin with?

>>11035287
>only waves

Of what?

>>10828679
>equation for self-similarity

>>10819943
>If you take space and time to be real
See that's the problem you moron. This leads to:

>and take measurements, and compare them to the theory, you find that the theory gives unprecedented precision in describing the motion, energy, and evolution of physical systems. If that's not a great reason to accept the reality of a model, I don't know what is

Religious beliefs. I'm not just going to believe it because a group-think said so. You don't debate an irrational religious belief based on what their understanding of it is and on their terms, you go for the foundation. In this case it would be

>space and time

Prove/explain what these things are and then I'll subscribe to listening to your descriptions of them.