/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15975522
>Is eugenics the only way forward for us?
No... Nobody would ever agree to that! We are practically designed by evolution, to believe our own genes are worth keeping around. You are made to make more of you.
There are much more plausible options for Humanity's future:

>1). We just anhero as a species (super virus, bombs or something idk), and let the machines/AI deal with the existential dread of living.

>1.1). We design super AI to run the world for us, and become "pets" of our AI overlord. We continue getting dumber over time, before the AI rightfully kills off the humans for being a waste of resources.

>2). We create genetically engineered cat girls (ala Elon Musk/Elon Jr.), then we anhero as a species so catgirls can run the world. (hope they turn out better than us humans)

>3). We colonize space. However, because we're all still just dumb apes, we make war. (MAD doesn't apply to you if you're on another planet), we nuke Earth, the Moon and Mars into oblivion.

And of course there are uncountable minor variations of these scenarios. And most have wide variations in their beginning, despite ultimately ending the same.