/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5636302
Well that's just the thing, it is a true choice to how they see it, we think of our wills because of popsci as something immediate and flexable, but the fact is we are dispositioned to reacting to our most current habitat- and as such more a thing of circumstance than, so to speak, known primes, that being said, being just that can you reflex yourself to adapt very quickly if you have relegated your frontal lobe correlations to bind with THE most current habitat- that is assuming you have conceived of them and have a confidence of... well, a lack of blockages, just to keep concurrent, of accessing those reactions

>>5471914
>1: Derive energy from substance
>2: Apply to conforming base to produce continuum

ok /sci/ need your help. I have the following:

Offset from what it should be: 0, 0, 4, 16, 22, 32, 44, 54
Item : 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

what the offset should be is (item number * 133) (actually starts at 0, and 133 is added after every iteration)

anyone see a pattern? i need a mathematical way of getting the offset to 0 for all of them if possible. this is for a program, and therefore i have other solutions, but they would be less effective (waaaaaay less effective). Any help would be appreciated.

>>2087883

>>1883529
agreed

>>1829142

I'm coming with!

>>1792428
I wish I was as cool as you are when I was 13.

>electromagnetic time flux manipulation

hey sci. i would like to ask about your opinions of future space travel. personally, exploran the stars would be pretty damn awesome, and it will happen hopefully eventually, with the condition that we don't kill ourselves.