/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9972017
Not an argument

>>9783635
Oh look, it's that blatant nuke shill again that only appears once every few months exactly when there's bad news trending about nuclear power.

>>9657190
The inventor said his design wasn't safe when scaled up beyond those in nuclear subs. The top nuclear safety regulator at the time said to him that he's in the wrong field if he so concerned about safety.

Literally the worst industry on earth.

>>9611158
>Uranium
>59 years

Nukefag shills will ignore this.

>>8308746
Because they are paid for by the government but run and owned by PRIVATE companies that will abandon a doomed plant to its fate.

>Nuclear shills will attack nationalization
>Nuclear shills are full of shit

>>7745875
>nukefags blown the fuck out

>/sci/ can't circle jerk nuclear power hard enough
>go to the wiki page
>stub page with next to nothing on it

You're all a bunch paid shills aren't you

>>7488692
He's too busy samefagging his "we luv nucular power" threads to post.