/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12645498
>For those who will start arguing about "accurate and incomplete":
>"Accurate": Models built from the theory accurately predict the outcomes of experiments and do not differ appreciably from reality within the theory's domain of validity, which is large enough to be useful.
>"Incomplete": The theory's domain of validity does not encompass the entire universe.
Just adjust the domain of validity for any conspiracy theory, and that conspiracy theory becomes an "accurate and incomplete descriptions of reality."

>if you disagree with thermodynamics, you are wrong.
What kind of anti-science is this; 'if you disagree, you are automatically wrong' bull crap?
back to >>>/x/ with you