/sci/ - Science & Math

Clavicles.

>Furthermore

brainlet: no nuclear
reasonable: nuclear fission
150 IQ: nuclear fusion
200 IQ: solar power with better energy storage

We already have nuclear fusion. It's called the sun.

At what do level do you think math becomes pointless wank?

>therefore I conclude

>>9594632
Thanks

>let

>>9071090
>tfw too smart to have sex

>>8933844
10+10+10+10=1 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{39}[/math]
10+10+10+10=2 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{38}[/math]
10+10+10+10=3 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{37}[/math]
10+10+10+10=4 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{36}[/math]
10+10+10+10=5 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{35}[/math]
10+10+10+10=6 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{34}[/math]
10+10+10+10=7 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{33}[/math]
10+10+10+10=8 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{32}[/math]
10+10+10+10=9 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{31}[/math]
10+10+10+10=10 in [math]\mathbb{Z}_{30}[/math]

>>8868151
Nice brainlet bait.

>>8795010
>t. Someone who is deluded about programming

Java is probably the most portable, but it is also the most shit...

Commonly used in programming that isn't shit would be C++

BTW, all languages that don't have a logic, heavy math focus, are

B. R A I N L E T
R.
A.
I.
N.
L.
E.
T.

tier, as it probably means you want to programming as a career, and never do research, which for the most part means you should visit /g/ instead of /sci/

The only people who get a pass in STEM here with computers are actual computer scientists, but those are fucking rare, and you don't sound like that's anything what you want to do.


The mere fact that calculus scared you means anything "interesting" to /sci/ is beyond your reach unless you decide to attempt losing your brainlet status.

Seriously, most of what we like here is autistic elitism, but it's not unfounded or unwarranted. We simply want nothing to do with people who can't pass relatively basic math courses, or at least that they're not interested in pushing through it for the very simple fact that the most interesting shit in the world, takes a lot of hard work to learn.

I suggest you spend several more months between here, /g/, reading the wiki's for both, especially /g/'s

After a while you should get a sense for what's interesting to you and where you want to go.

Don't ever immediately make a decision off what you read on 4chan in general though, you could easily be getting memed, and cutting your teeth on some of this shit really is a big mistake. Always investigate shit for yourself, taking into account all the info you can.

Then think about it, weigh your options and goals you want to meet, and don't be a fucking screw up.

>>8764330
(you)

>>8757196
(you) un-ironically think this way.

Sad, how sad. You're the same shitposter from all the previous threads who always whines on about his feelings and emotions and compares a legitimate scientific body of research to religion because it hurts your feelings. Why do you even browse /sci/, and further, why do you continue to make / post in these threads when your argument is literally an appeal to emotion every single time?

>Yeah and the Pope of Rome is a chemist.
Statements such as this show how truly irrational of a person you are, and that you're never going to engage in a rational or reasonable discussion. Why are you so overly emotional? I'm guessing you also believe that your contrarian scientists like Happer, or Singer, or Lindzen, or Spencer / Christy are also "priests?" Keep in mind that the latter three all have training in atmospheric physics, as do many non-contrarian climate scientists.

Do you know what a religious belief is? It's when you reject scientific evidence in favor of an emotional argument, which unsurprisingly is exactly what your entire argument is. It has no basis in evidence, only emotion.

https://phys.org/news/2017-03-bias-climate.html
Does this trigger you as well? Let me guess, it too is a part of your imagined conspiracy as well, because, why not?
>The conclusion is that climate researchers do not conceal uncomfortable facts which could potentially disprove climate change.

Essentially, the authors tested for biases in thousands of climate science studies, and found that there was no evidence of publication bias in the science. Basically this means that within the field, both insignificant and significant findings were reported, though the more significant findings tended to have a larger presence in the abstract vs. the less significant ones, which isn't surprising.

>>8708816
it doesnt really make a difference to us whether the earth is flat or not
theres still nothing of real use out there

>tfw 16 bit video game music is my favorite

Reminder that no contest, INTJ is categorically superior.

What is the smartest person in recorded history? Ramanujan? Von Neumann? William James Sidis?
Out of the three Von Neumann seems to be the brainlet.
Is there other übergenius that is worth mentioning?

>inb4 Gauss/Einstein/Feyman/etc. was a lot more relevant than they were
I'm not talking about achievements, but about intelligence itself.

>tfw to smart to have friends

>>8593732
What is the patrician depiction?

>too intelligent to believe in jewish lies

>tfw to intelligent to major in stem