/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10836791
>Then why do traps exist? Did hormones reshape their skull after they were done growing?
No, you fucking retard. It's almost impossible not to notice the obvious differences between trannies and women in real life, exactly because things like their skeletal structure are still 100% male.
Only way you could possibly fall for their attempted deception is if you're looking at a heavily manipulated photograph they took of themselves at a very specific angle without anyone else in the shot to provide a comparative reference of size / scale.
Pic related is a good example. You could almost believe the first image on the left shows a tranny doing a decent job looking like a real woman. But then look at the image on the right which is what you would actually see in real life. The male form becomes super-clear looking at the entire body from an impartial random snapshot instead of a close up deceptive angle controlled by the tranny himself.
Only other way tranny deception could work is on small children or autists since they're more likely to come up with oversimplified categorical rules like "long hair = female" and then go off of that instead of what a normal mentally healthy adult would do which is actually take in the holistic visuals altogether and intuitively recognize how a man is a man even when disguising himself with a few superficial feminine attributes like long hair, makeup, breast implants, and women's clothing.

>>10730321
And it just shows how the fedora tipping, non-STEM "skeptic" community has remained a joke for the past decade+ that its festered on the internet. The only difference now is that there's a political split between these people. Some went far right, others went far left.
Watching the skeptic community change over time is enjoyably grotesque, like watching one of the monsters from Resident Evil slowly devolve into an increasingly hideous flesh abomination.
You start out with a couple high school kids acting edgy online and trying to stick it to the man by bashing religion. Then you see them either enter college in liberal arts programs, or fail out of STEM classes because of their lack of intelligence and/or dedication. Then as their lives spiral down an increasing rabbit hole of failure and insanity, they become increasingly unstable and hideous looking.
Just look at Contrapoints. Initially an edgy, upper middle class teenager who was ranting against religion in his initial videos. Then his father literally pulled strings to get him into Berkeley, because he was already mentally unhinged and going in and out of mental therapy. Then he eventually went to a much lower ranked school, and failed out. Now he's masquerading as a marxist AGP freak, even though he likely stole a spot at Berkeley from a much lower class student who had worked harder for the spot, but wasn't lucky to have a daddy with connections. The New Atheist movement was inevitable. You have people here who have no intelligence or desire to improve. Like Christian Chandler, a high functioning autistic who never learned to draw despite scribbling shit in marker for his entire life, you have an entire group of people that only want to scream surface level philosophy and politics at each other, without the ability to ever improve.

ON NO NO NO NO