/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6178359
>Do you think that artificial intelligence's are possible?

Absolutely. Our mind is just a learning machine. We can replicate that.

>If so, do you think they are probable?

Given that the person who invents one will become a trillionaire, I'd say they're inevitable.

>Should we even try to create such entities?

Unfortunately, I don't think we can stop it. Ted tried & failed.

>Dreaming
>Outside
>Look out at the sky
>I can see the entirety of the universe
>Nothing between me and the most distant stars
>BT's This Binary Universe is playing across the universe
>Everything is completely at peace
>Witness not a sunrise, but a galaxyrise
>A dawn lit by four hundred billion suns
>The rising of the milky way
>Most beautiful thing ever witnessed
>Wake up
>Look out window to see if I can see anything even close to that
>Light pollution makes it impossible to see anything but satellites and airplanes
>MFW

no

>>4255460
Everything else is just a surrogate activity,
directed toward an artificial goal that people set up for themselves merely in order to have some goal to work toward, or let us say, merely for the sake of the 'fulfillment' that they get from pursuing the goal
science marches on blindly, without regard to the real welfare of the human race or to any other standard, obedient only to the psychological needs of the scientists and of the government officials and corporation executives who provide the funds for research.

>>3919791
>confirmed unabomber

This, this guy right here.
He's a motherfucker.

>>1052995

I'm with you on that one.