/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14846982
>according to most studies

>>14555452
>identify and understand important papers for knowing a subject in depth
Except for mathematics, you can't know a subject "in-depth" just by reading papers. You gotta have actual experience in the field. If you just read papers you're relying on other experts and you're not yourself an expert.
Also, as this guy >>14555489 said, logic trumps dogma. Trusting "experts" unconditionally makes you no better than some illiterate medieval peasant who believes everything the priest says, even when the priest contradicts himself.
And if Pfizer were trustworthy and had nothing to hide they would have made their vaccine trial documents publicly available. Why would you trust opaque organizations just because they claim "expertise"?