/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15342011
>electrocuting innocent animals
Nah I'd rather not

>>15028568
>I'm not moving the goalposts
But you are, because we're not talking about the way things are described, but about things existing, but time does not exist, spacetime is a 4D vector space coordinate system, describing only your coordinates, aka position, in relation to everything else, space and time are not things which physically exist like particles or radiation, as they aren't made of anything nor do they contain any empirically measurable parts, if you want to prove that time exists you will have to prove that the past and future exist, that all the states of the system which could occur and have ever occured are still around and you can measure them whenever you want to, which you can't do, because there is always only one state of the system, there is no five "seconds" to the future or to the past, there is ever only one "second", you only exist in one moment forever, any notion of a "passage of time" is subjective observation, given rise to by the way your brain processes information, but an empirical passage of time as such simply does not exist. You are just trying to make shit needlessly complicated when it's very simple.