/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15791097
>>15791084
>raw data overestimates warming but I’ll just ignore that ;)

>>15585545
Raw global data overestimates warming though, shouldn’t climate scientists be using raw by your own arguments?

>>15570019
You keep posting this as if no one can tell that’s a regional dataset and global raw temperatures overestimate warming before corrections

>>15545190
Why do you keep deflecting with yet another regional dataset that has nothing to do with the one I posted and ignore that globally, raw data overestimates warming?
Answer the simple question. Do you have any specific arguments about the PAGES 2k methodology?

>>15469216
Do you have any arguments or are you pretending that you’re not able to follow the replies? It’s a pretty simple concept. Dyson’s ignorance about climate models are irrelevant to the fact that rapid warming is an empirically measured phenomenon especially when he says people should be out measuring it.
>>15469222
>I’m going to pick a specific region and time span to maliciously misrepresent a dataset even though the urban heating correction actually reduces the warming trend
Lmao even

>>15462987
>I don’t understand how trend lines work
Lmao
>>15462985
The raw data overestimates warming though not that you knew that