/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8593742
>despite the field including people from all walks of scientific training, including fields such as physics, atmospheric chemistry, geology, biology, oceanography, paleoclimatology, stratigraphy, geochemistry, geophysiocs, meteorology, geomorphology, glaciology, hydrology, pedology, biogeography, ecology, volcanology, remote sensing, geodesy, and many, MANY more, do I need to go on?

No, you have simply highlighted the completely scatterbrained and impossibly complex approach to the new age political religion known as climatology. Instead of garnering a passing interest in this infantile 'science' by certain people so inclined its will is being imposed on everyone and any meaningful debate is being shutdown for the sole reason taxes are already being implemented, have been implemented and now must be justified at all costs, including the truth.

The frightening aspect of that is just how far bloated parasitic bureaucracies will go in order to justify their existence.

Like the ridiculously complex computer modeled prophecies of earths climate heavily biased towards CO2 molecules implying certain climate doom unless drastically restricted, and my own prophecies of totalitarian climate despots rising waving this synthetic flag of manufactured bullshit, time will tell. I would bet the farm the latter rise before the former and I think it extremely foolish and ignorant to give those despots a head start before even coming up with a plausible alternative to fossil fuel energy. I understand the anger towards our dependency on fossil fuel but do not make the mistake we are not dependent on them for our very survival at this juncture. I would add, down the road, make sure your ruling climate despots at least practice what they preach!