/sci/ - Science & Math

>4chan learning math guide
>includes topics as obscure as algebraic topology
>no probability or stochastics

What's an actual math guide for the current age?

let's say i have 0% knowledge of numbers too and the entire history to where we got, what would be the best set of books and path to follow for an absolute beginner?

i just wanna stop being dumb at math starting today.

is picrel a decent choice?

>>14751961
>>14751980

>>14623439
> Meme chart poster
You will never be a real mathematician. You have no Quantitative Reasoning skills, you have no rigor.

>>14514729

>>12795276

Someone rate and/or add something to this list please.

>>12762319
What level are you at now and what do you want to learn?

If you're into abstract algebra at all I'd really recommend Gallian. Its a great book and doesn't require much background.

>>12748131
If you’re not doing Landau start to finish you’re doing it wrong

>>12278817

>>12149728

Where should I start if ive just done calc 1-3 and diff eq a few years ago but want to learn more? taking a gap year before grad school and want to build on my math

>>11926869

>>11874199
>>11874257
Or this, both are fine.

>>11864288
this unironically>>11863270
and pic related

>>11835627
here good luck

How do I proceed if I want to broaden my knowledge of game theory?

Any guide for starting Math from scratch to advanced ? i found this guide but not sure if its a good one, i prefer very detailed books, something like eulers elements of algebra

>>11645543

Have them start with these

>>11621371
Putting a system of linear equations into matrix form is super useful when you want to solve that system.
You simply take the coefficients, and insert them into a matrix. Note that the cofficients must be attatched to the same "kind" of variable (my math education was not in english, sorry). Your matrix would look like so:

0 0 -2 7
0 1 3 0
0 4-1 6
2 -5 1 3

Where the first column represents all x^3, second row all x^2 and so on.

this is pretty elementary stuff, and will be in the first chapter of EVERY book on linear algebra.

The "matrix" that you made is wrong. Primarily because it's not a matrix, but a vector, and it's a row vector, not a column vector.

Does this chart say I should do either the Gelfand treatment or Basic Mathematics by Serge Lang? Or does it mean read all the Gelfand books then proceed to Basic Mathematics?

>>11500982

>>11273520