[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9059718 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9059718

>>9059657
>There were some days when I would just open a latex editor and do math problems at my job the entire day.

>tfw this is my current situation, down to shirking programming work to do math problems in TeX

It's not even an issue with the nature of my projects (working on them has been intellectually stimulating and I've learnt a lot from the experience), but that they've been stuck with me months after the innovative aspects have given way to administrative tedium, and what was once a joy to work on (a chance to learn something new!) has become a chore.

That said, it's probably just me being a lazy sack of shit (occupational hazard from studying mathematics, though it was definitely worse once I became a full-time programmer). OP would probably fare better than I did should he decide to follow my path.

>> No.9037804 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9037804

>>9037709
>The successor of the smallest non-useful number
Shit, that's exactly the wrong way around.
That should have been "successor of the largest useful number".

>> No.9006926 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9006926

>>9006920
[math]x = x0 + v_0 t + 1/2at^2[/math]
[math]\tan^{ \wedge _2}(x) + 1 = \sec^{ \wedge_2}(x)[/math]
[math]M_g( NO_3)_2[/math]

It's obviously a joke image.

...Right?

>> No.8979359 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8979359

>whence

>> No.8529059 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8529059

>>8529054
...and I forgot that 0 is non-negative as well. Which means that the correct solution should be to subtract 1 from everything (i.e., Albert has 7 and Bernard has 6).

>> No.8498356 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8498356

>>8498349
>32+16=20+d
>plugging this into Wolfram Alpha

Humanity truly has declined

>> No.8452977 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8452977

>>8452971
Do I really have to spell it out?
Let B be any n*n square matrix other than the identity matrix.
Let A be the m*n zero matrix.
Then AB = A but B is not the identity.

>> No.7313186 [View]
File: 135 KB, 438x444, kaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7313186

If X is a random variable with probability density f(x) on <span class="math">(0,\:\infty)[/spoiler] (e.g. gamma distribution), and <span class="math">b[/spoiler] is a nonzero real, then the density of <span class="math">y=x^b[/spoiler] is <span class="math">f(y^{1/b}) \div \left( \abs{b}[y^{1/b}]^{b-1} \right)[/spoiler].

How does this generalize to random positive-definite matrices? If X is Wishart distributed, for example, what does the density of <span class="math">X^b = Q^TD^bQ[/spoiler] look like?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]