/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9484865
>that blue

Bad news for you nigga, you are colorblind

>>9468611
yeah I know, im still considering whether to go into math or physics and the math classes I've had here have been good enough that I'm leaning towards math.

>tfw prof can't be there for a day so he has us watch a video of some prestigious math people talking about infinity
>one of them is William Woodin, one of the foremost set theorists in the world
>later woodin gets brought up by a different proffessor and he mentions the first prof actually btfod Woodin as his phd dissertation

>posts something very unlikely with no evidence at all

hmm. how would you even know it was him? was he a tripfag?

Physicists are honestly a step down in human evolution.
They burn bridges by making physics education complete shit and having poor standards for keeping it clean.

Like, physicists name things whatever they like, unlike other fields.
Chemists are so rigorous that the properties of the elements are partly described by the name of the element.
Physicists though name everything after the scientist who discovered it, and use unnecessary amounts of jargon.

Without help from other fields, physics will eventually stagnate because it can already take a decade of training just to be able to read most the garble leading physicists produce.
It already seems like young physicists are already having to cram so much poorly-worded information that they don't have time to comprehend it, as if they could find it explained in a rigorous way if they tried.
They're incredibly poor at discussing their own subject and it's easy to out them as not actually understanding what they're talking about, I have yet to meet a young physicist who seems to know anything at all.

The only chances physics stands is either if physicists are taught to and expected to be comprehensible and rigorous in their writing and teaching, or if new standards of information are formed that leaves no room for jargon and ambiguity (like chemistry).

>>8662661
>children's views of the world: the post

>>8606956
>Vacuum

No such thing in nature.

is math invented or discovered?