/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9665981
Lemme spell it out so your innuendo doesn't have to play at being Damocles' sword: you would say it's because I'm part of a conspiracy to 'hide the truth' of a flat Earth.

I would take you seriously if you posed sensible arguments in favor of a flat Earth. But you don't. The responses in this thread have been anything but sincere. Or if they were, then I'd have to take pity on you. I'm not buying that.

Also, you're not even proving a flat Earth. Everything in this thread is about how the round Earth arguments have been flawed (and haven't, but that brings us back to the stupid responses). An allegory to your contentions is like someone saying their house is whit. You come out and say it's yellow, and your proof is that it looks yellow to you. I note you have yellow sunglasses on. You say they have special lenses that correct light.

But even if the house isn't white, you never prove the house is yellow. So I can't take you seriously. The memes are posted to get to *your* level of stupid, not 4Chan's.

>>8840683
Yes, I do.
>>8840684
WTF?

It's this Saturday (April 22). Science-oriented folks will march to show numbers of people who are adamant enough about the importance of science to show up and be counted.

>>8588495
>It is known to be impossible to propel yourself in space since there is no air to push against.
You know, arguing against any this stupid boggles the mind. I know there's a spectrum of intelligence from genius to vegetable, but encountering someone this close to potato yet still able to type a coherent sentence revealing the sheer incapacity to think, is breathtaking.

Congratulations on your talent to completely stop me in my tracks. I simply don't know how to communicate with someone so stubbornly ignorant.