/sci/ - Science & Math

/sci/, I have a basic question about the multiverse theory.

Say we prove that the multiverse theory is correct, and we're able to travel back in time (to a parallel universe). Would we ever be able to get back to our original universe with the original timeline, or would we be forever stuck in the universe that we changed?

>(2tan)/(1-tan^2)+1/(cos^2)-(sin^2)=(cos+sin)/(cos-sin)

so far I've got it to
2(cos^4-sin^4)*tan(cos^2-sin^2)+(1-tan^2)/(1-tan^2)*((cos^2)-(sin^2))

am I on the right track? At least in the ballpark parking lot?

hell...

I'd tackle you at random in broad daylight and strap a nice heavy duty padlock on that bad boy before running off.

>>2370062
and to prove the point to go so far as to make fun of those smarter than you and I.

Well played. Bravo.
Our new names are, 'dipstick' & 'doorknob'.
I'll even give you dibs.

suggesting one can not live a fulfilled and happy life doing things outside your narrow scope of imagination is a little insulting though. You sting me.

For the advancement of the human race, pretty much everything needs to be god tier because it's all neccesary. For example, statistics is a required field for the advancement of pharmacology, which you have a tier above it. Both of those and toxicology are a requirement for the medicinal field, which is even higher than either of them.

I could go on but I think you get my point.

>>2314607
No wonder he has such a big grin all the time.
I would too.

After we die...what is the next logical form of existence? I don't think it can be nothing, because we only perceive when we're conscious, and if we're not conscious we don't perceive, and one cannot not perceive (as redundant as that statement is). Also, please don't say it will just be blackness, let's just assume that's not a possibility and one MUST BE PERCEIVING AT ALL TIMES.

Frankly I don't think it's anything to do with an afterlife or God...I personally believe you take on the existence of some new form of life, be it a grasshopper, a newborn human, etc.

but i have it on good authority a rover put those mirrors there...

how would bouncing a laser off them prove men went there?

in our neck of the woods the term is, 'bullshit.'

why the hell is that bullet still in the cartridge if it just got fired?

basically it's like the leg of pantyhose filled with cottage cheese and small rocks that some angry midget is failing around like a mad man...but i see nothing wrong with it per say....it's all i've ever known

>>2107606

maybe YOU might. Then again, it sounds like you have never been interrogated with more "passive" psychological means before either...

Most of humanity would even agree with you in fact.
Again most of them have never had a proper interrogation either.
To bad humans are easily manipulated...the truth in such situations you see, is derived from what a person BELIEVES and not actual truth as it is defined

that's the rub...a person will say whatever they believe to be true whether they are under stress or not.

>>2089264

try Alaskan king crab fishing.
you have no concept what an "all nighter" is

I think it'll be something like, "gurgle..eep" or something equally stupid.

Ideally i'll be shot dead by an enraged husband at the ripe old age of 102 and manage a, "!!".

...but i know my luck