/sci/ - Science & Math

Figure 1.1 Introduction, General considerations
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1809.0234

not convinced by his proof because I am convinced by this disproof:
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

>>10000946
>What makes you think you aren't one of them?
My high opinion of technical ability. Prove me wrong. Several people have pointed out my trivial errors, but no one pointed to a non-trivial one and there isn't much content there to sift through. Notice how in this other paper
>On The Riemann Zeta Function
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1703.0073
I say that I argue against the Riemann hypothesis instead of saying I disprove it? In that case of the RH, there's a lot more nuance where I could have missed something important. This result about sine and cosine, however, borders on trivial.

>>9758362
>>9758360
>>9758365
>>9758448
>>9758454
>>9758344
>100% of the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function are on the critical line, pic related
I proved that the critical line stops hazing Re(z)=0.5 somewhere between countable and uncountable infinity
On The Riemann Zeta Function
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

>>9681384
>>9681387
RH already disproven
On The Riemann Zeta Function
http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

How many are unsolved. Didn't some guy in India claim Navier-Stokes a few years ago? I disproved Riemann hypothesis last year.
>On The Riemann Zeta Function
>http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

>>9504891
The main reason I harp on people being stupid is because idiots said my research sucked to begins with and other idiots believed them. Even if you didn't understand physics when that happened almost ten years ago, the fact that people still say, "I can't understand that, I'll just defer to the opinion of the idiots who wear nametags that say 'EXPERT'," means that the idiots not only didn't understand, but have made no effort to try understand over the following ~10 years.

The whole point of God is that he tends the sheep, not everyone is smart. That is ok. I get very angry when we aren't real clear about that, and then I get mad when some people who are not smart believe the other people who are also not smart when they say that my research sucks. There are other smart people out there? Where are they? Where are their reviews of my research? It's the idiots getting in the way pretending to intelligence that are fucking everything up.

TL;DR: It's been al ost ten years, no one can make the legitimate excuse "Oh I can't understand that," any more. Now the excuse is, "I didn't want to understand that." I was in college for less than ten years.

>>9473991
It's shorthand for "Written by an expert in physics."

Look at my argument against the Riemann hypothesis

>On The Riemann Zeta Function
>http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

I think I came up with a good reason for it when I was arguing against the Reimann hypothesis

http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

>http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073
>On The Riemann Zeta Function

Authors: Jonathan Tooker

We discuss the Riemann zeta function, the topology of its domain, and make an argument against the Riemann hypothesis. While making the argument in the classical formalism, we discuss the material as it relates to the theory of infinite complexity (TOIC). We extend Riemann's own (planar) analytic continuation [math]\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}[/math] into (bulk) hypercomplexity with [math]\mathbb{C}\to\,^\star\mathbb{C}[/math]. We propose a solution to the Banach--Tarski paradox.

I would marry one that understands "mathematics" already has an S at the end and the best abbreviation of the word is "math."

http://vixra.org/author/jonathan_tooker

You may have enjoyed my recent post about the Riemann hypothesis. If you did not see it, please have a look and notice how the analytical framework un-paradoxes the Banach--Tarski paradox.

http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

Why am I posting again? To beg for money of course!!! Even if my argument is correct, it is probably not formatted to get the Millennium Prize money, and even if it was my personal ethics prevent me from publishing it the place where it have to go to qualify for the money... and that money is, I think, not actually for solving the problem, but for having a solution in "officially sanctioned literature" for two years without being refuted. I will probably have scabies in two years if nothing changes so that doesn't work for me anyhow. So... Here I am begging for money.

funds
[dot]
gofundme
[dot]
com/dashboard/need-money-to-open-jiujitsu-school