/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15048097
From the intro:
> No formal prerequisites other than college algebra are needed for most of the material, other than mathematical maturity.
So basically you should be good. See what you can get through, and ask for help/google what you don't.

>>15051513
Garrity's book is good. I also recommend his mathematical maturity talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHU1xH6Ogs4..

Agree with >>15052436 on doing linear algebra, maybe try this: https://codingthematrix.com/ Axler's book is more theoretical but also good.

>>15052426
Depends on how much you like the analysis. If you do, I would learn measure theory next. Folland's text is standard but I personally prefer Stein and Shakarchi (more friendlier). Also pretty sure Tao and Axler also have good measure theory books; Axler's is free online. If not, then try complex analysis (Bak/Newman more elementary, standard reference is Ahlfors or Stein/Shakarchi. Also partial to Priestley) or differential geometry (Lee's Intro to Smooth Manifolds)