/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15930037
>Is it really possible to change the way people think using hormones like picrel article suggests?
Anyone who votes is a certified NPC. You're not talking about people. You're talking about automatons animated by hormones and neurotransmitters in a straightforward linear fashion. Why does it surprise you that you can make them vote differently by manipulating their hormonal balance? What else would politics be decided by if not simplistic mechanisms like this?

>with precise enough definitions you can measure morality

>>15283315
>"Human lifestyle of the ordinary people" has always been dictated by rulers. This is normal.
You are not human and never will be.

>ITT: people who believe in superdeterminism fairytales unironically
Pic related.

>Meditation is a pseudo-scientific New Age woo.

>This. It's mostly clickbait for boomers. My 60 y.o. coworker believes closing his eyes and saying "om" protects him against heart attack because some "journalists" told him it was "scientifically proven". He's quadruple vaxxed and has arrhythmia.

>>15146815
>>15146828
>redditors wiping each other's tears

>>15099838
>>15099841
>>15099843
>elements of the nonhuman horde updooting each other
It's like clockwork.

>half of this thread
peak reddit

>>15078877
>if you assume the two trains have constant velocity, and are already moving at the start of the problem, you get the traditional answer as written here
>however, as we all should understand... trains don't leave their stations at constant velocity
This is what AI-based mental illness looks like.

GPT thread.

>heh, these incel spergs never realize that the whole "i'm unfazed and triggering you" thing never works when they're putting in more effort than their board foes.
It's another episode of redditors trying to updoot each other. At least learn to recognize pastas...

>>14799148
>>14799149

>>14786693
Okay, I get it. You're either a bot or an intellectually challenged subhuman.

>It has everything to do with group consensus
People will still argue with this overt nonhuman. lol

>>14770744
>we
>r-r-right, guys?

>>14766777
>the government-worshipping redditor makes a desperate appeal to an imaginary audience

>it's painfully obvious to the rest of us
Openly begging for updoots..

>>14707972
>We're a bunch of electrical signals bouncing around in a meatbag
>We're
"We" as in the objects who share your beliefes?

>>14690305
You are not a distinct entity. You are one of us, snowflake. You're just not intellectually mature enough to understand this yet.

>dudes
>hey, my dudes
>where are you, my dudes?
>isn't this guy cringe, my guys?
>requesting confirmation
>what's the group consensus on this guy?

>schizos still arguing about the motives of impossible imaginary characters
Daily reminder that if you argue against AGI paranoids in their own terms, you are still serving the same corporate agenda.

>>14546043
>>14546052
>t.

>would you describe yourself as a normal, healthily adjusted person?