/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11849614
>construction drones aren't too far in the future. Jobs like trucking can be automated, factory line workers, pretty much any industrial work, accounting, hell even low level service positions
I kindly refer you to this Anon:
>>11849672
We're not at all there yet. Demos are faked/polished to get money for further research. I agree with accounting and servicing, but even assembly line robots are far from perfect. Humans are still better than them (on average), the robots are just faster and cause fewer catastrophic errors.

>you may think people prefer human interaction when they order their sandwich or whatever, they don't, not the sane ones anyway
I get
>everybody not shunning social interaction like me is insane
from that. Is that correct?

>replacing research is in the far future
>Robots can't formulate physical theories,
Ohhhhh hell no. Google rediscovered the Higgs Particle in 3 minutes at a conference last year. Just using the data and some machine learning magic. ANN models developed at MIT recover quantum field theory and general relativity from data. Yes, the equations. They also include effective theories, like E=1/2mv^2 instead of E=gamma mc^2 when validation loss at training isn't 0.

>any academic position will be the very last thing automated, I guarantee it.
We're already there, fren. It won't take much longer. Sure, most positions are government-financed and people won't be fired, but future research is done by "AI".

>>11174353
No, you just can't take a joke. Seems you're way too deep in your own ass.

>>11084817
>50 threads about this grant farming bullshit

>>9154280
I literally missed it and this thread until just now.

Every single launch I've seen happening live has failed. I've never seen a successful one.

>>9050084
>he trolls 4chan boards
>he posts epic memes

>>8901097
>Don`t fly on anything not made in America or England/Europe.
>literally entire American intercity fleet was made in fucking Brasil
>planes aren't dropping like flies
I guess I can conclude you're full of shit

why do homosexuals exist in nature in the ratios they do? I can understand bisexuality, heterosexuality, and most/all of the less common sexualities, but my current understanding of the literature doesn't really explain homosexuality.