/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10771560
>Climate change is real
>Real

Framing climate change as a belief/denial alternative was probably the most ingenious thing the corporate lobby could do

Its not a question of believing scientific research or denying scientific research, it is the basic question of being capable of understanding science.

If you are incapable of reading and understanding the scientific literature that presents the consequences of human activities on our climate, and the repercussions that will have, then I just feel sorry for you.
You should just say "I don't understand it enough to take a position" instead of reasoning "I'm not gonna believe it because a guy on tv or an internet forum / youtube video said that you shouldn't believe it because it's a conspiracy"
But I guess that you are just as retarded as the people who say they believe that Illuminati is in controll of Hollywood, that vaccines are governmentally sanctioned poison, that "chemtrails" poison the air we breath, and that Alex Jones vitamin suplements aren't placebo pills but that they actually work.
I think you should stay on /x/ instead of going to /sci/


>>10771828
If you think that you or anyone else has found a substantial speck of evidence that would disprove the last 25 years of global scientific consensus regarding the effects of human activity on our climate, then I would encourage you to present it.

If it realy will reveal the "ooh so great conspiracy of the climate scientists, environmental scientists, oceanographers etc; and yada, yada", then I'm sure that it will be front page news in every major newspaper around the world by tomorrow.

Unless you of course believe that all the news agencies are infiltrated by leftists, or that they have some obscure agenda to further "the lie". Then yea, you are delusional.
Thank you both for rustling my Jimmies