/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10638920
>unfounded and historically bizarre blank-slate position
Never said that Cathy
>YOU are the one with the strange, extraordinary views
I disagree.
Again, I ask you simply to cite your scientific sources or considered research or some form of profound opinion or go back to /pol/

I never said the concept of race doesn't exist. I merely ask you to define race empirically beyond your subjective view of
>But muh everyone accepts race as a concept
Go on try to define race
If not then at least try to try.

>and only some serious ethnocentrism or lack of worldliness on your part could blind you to that.
Never even implied that, but hey go ahead and accuse

Again this is all very simple
Define race scientifically.
Define Intelligence
Define the parameters that govern these definitions
And let's continue

Otherwise you are simply parroting anecdoatal societal perceptions.

Why not even look at the ways in which the definitions of race, in accordance with your
>But societies dey iz always talking about da races so it must be a valid concept scientifically and empirically yeah
have always differed across the ages throughout cultures.

Try reading some Roman and Greek literature and historical accounts that show how race was viewed and compare and contrast with Indian, African and Chinese notions of race throughout the ages.
Maybe /his/ can help you actually learn something. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe you are right. Why not explore.