/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14765400
>"had" by anyone you can ask. It isn't. That doesn't mean it or the concept isn't true or real. It is "what animates". To call it or know it or "have it" is contradictory. You would have "object
Schizo crap.

>. I don't "possess" THE soul
Bad word game yet I HAVE air in my loungs.
And I HAVE a WiFi signal
And I HAVE a radio conection.

>"possess"
I did say HAVE not possess you dumbfuck !

Your entire fucken point rests on semantics that actually debunk you.

>You are asking me to show you something I don't have, that no one "has"
You debunked yourself schizo.
> that no one "has"
Cool no one has a soul now shut up schizo.
>something I don't have, that no one "has"
Yet the phrase "I have a radio signal" is used so what it will be ? "no one has a radio signal" ?

> because you're relying on a religious definition/notion of "soul" in the first place
And beyond debunked schizo !

So lets see
>Be fagot retard with schizophrenia
>Get born into a religious culture that uses the word soul
>Schizo retard says
>>y-y-y-you all are wrong what the soul is I know what the soul is
SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP

> See you're also assuming with this inquiry that there are in fact now multiple "souls"
YES. Since 99.9999999% of people who believe in a soul have this model. However you the retard schizo who is 00.00000000000000001% of humans alive has the right one and I'm the incompetent one for not knowing your magic model.

>It is "what animates". To call it or know it or "have it" is contradictory.
Schizo crap.