/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11928456
Yes Asians have higher intellects than whities
Albinomutts btfo

Quick question: do different races have different IQ or does evolution stop at the neck?

>>9467544
Why do people who make these type of posts always hide chink demographic?

Thread for questions and discussion about race and Iq and other shit.

I'll start : -

On what context does race exist?
The social constructionists can go on about how it is a cultural manifestation but where does it stop. We'll keep going on and on till we reach a point where we believe everything is a social construct. I do agree that on average social categorization is understandable as to an extent similar people would act and live in a mostly the same way and of course there'll be anomalies but they don't refute the existence of race as a psychological and social concept.

>>9179498
>lol i don't understand how iq is calculated
Lynn study gives RAW figures of famine / war-torn / underdeveloped nations.
To develop meaningful data that proves that the IQ difference is genetic, Murray & Herrnstein (authors of "The Bell Curve") had to adjust the raw figure to answer the question "what would African IQ be if it was on the level of first-world nations?" Thus producing pic related "innate" black IQ of 85 starting from Lynn's base IQ of 69.
But if raw IQ figure was 80 instead, (which is what you get if you don't cherrypick the lowest IQ studies like Lynn & Meisenberg) the "innate" black IQ comes to 95, a statistically insignificant difference and turning Murray's findings into a big nothingburger.
tldr; there is no evidence for racial differences in intelligence or IQ.

Hi /sci/, I'm really disturbed right now. I've been reading about racial IQ differences, and I'm not seeing good things. Why are white people smarter than blacks? How are asians so high, and why are they still mostly rice farmers and factory workers?
Why is nature racist?

>>4824290
Do you think their behaviour or lack of intelligence could possibly be related to genetics?

>>2367990
>>2367990
>First of all, it wasn't forced on people who wanted it.
It was forced on the entire nation. It was funded by taxpayers regardless of their consent. Schools were forcibly integrated. Not only did taxpayers have to pay for busing, they could not possibly avoid sending their children to those schools without withdrawing from public schools entirely.

>Secondly, integration is a matter of civil rights
What rights? The right to be able to beat up white kids and take their lunch money? The right to disrupt classes so children actually capable of learning are unable to?

>Whether or not they are less intelligent on average they are human beings entitled to the same rights as all other human beings.
I wish very much that liberals supported equal rights. Unfortunately they abandoned even the pretense of supporting equal rights long ago. They are only concerned with equal outcomes, and have no issues with racially discriminatory policies such as affirmative action intended to bring about equal outcomes.

I, personally, support equal rights. Which is why I find liberalism so reprehensible and feel the need to expose its lies.